I see, so its really easy to critisize, but extremely hard to prove. If you accept that in WORLD RELIGION, AND THAT IN EVERY SINGLE SCHOLARLY APPROACH TO SIKHISM STATES THAT IT IS DHARMIC THEN YOU ARE MISTAKEN and foolish to add.

DHARMA IS RIGHTEOUSNESS? WHAT?!?! Have you guys even read the guru granth sahib ji. You have to be kidding. So, this man who fully admitts he never read the granth sahib ji gives an ambigous name to dharma, which is fully realted to and discussed in the granth sahib ji and you quote him as a source??? HA, nice sources.

Nobody says to the read the Vedas. You wont. You never will, thats why your ignorance continues to grow.

How about you prove to me how it is not. Oh wait you cant.

You complain that I argue the same things, prove me wrong. CONTINUE TO NOT ACCEPT FACTS. AND YOU KNOW WHAT, YOU HAVE YET TO CITE A SINGLE SOURCE, BOOK, ANY LITERATURE TO BACK UP YOUR OWN CONSTRUED VIEWS THAT YOU HAVE IMPLANTED IN YOUR BRAIN AND PERSONALITY.....OH WAIT I FORGOT THE HUGE RELIABLE SOURCE OF RANDIP AND SUKHNIDAAN

both people who have admittingly never looked beyond their religion.

You never looked at religions beyond yours, then procalim it to be individual, and dissimilar from any other--- makes a lot of sense.

You look only at your own religion and then say.... My religion is nothing like anyone elses.

You have no idea how inceredibly faulty that is. The only answer to that, is that you CAN and will NEVER feel the urge to learn about other religions. I dont know you, and I can safely assure that. It doesnt brreak down your alligance, it only increases.

 

Become a little more educated, then lets talk.

PS- You question my sources, just look at the ones you choose to cite. Halirious.